Friday, April 24, 2015

Assignment Four: Written Reflection- Section Two

ASSIGNMENT FOUR: WRITTEN REFLECTION-Section Two- Teaching Essentials Chapters 4-6

Read Writing Essentials, Chapters 4-6 and BRIEFLY reflect on the following thoughts written below and any additional comments that you have after reading these chapters. Post your reflection to the course blog.

Chapter 4: Raise Your Expectations
• Why we need to raise expectations – ESPECIALLY for our minority and lower socio-economic students
• How to raise expectations in your classrooms as well as in your grade level and throughout your entire building
• What about handwriting, spelling and editing expectations?
• How to use the Optimal Learning Model to support your students’ needs

“Raising expectations” for our students is a big push in all of our districts. Under “No Child Left Behind” many schools have been identified as “in need of improvement” and have been working furiously yet unsuccessfully for over ten years to “close the gap” for our minority children. But more important than improving performance on high stakes tests is remembering that if we raise our expectations and teach explicitly, then our students will rise to the occasion and astonish us with the high quality work that each of them is capable of.

Regie has some great insight into the need to raise expectations of our students and feeling comfortable and confident with the decision to set high standards for all learners. She raises the question, What are our clearly articulated, rigorous yet reasonable expectations? This is a question that we should reflect on as individual teachers, and one that should be the starting point for a conversation within our grade levels, buildings and across entire districts.

We’d like to know what you think of one of our favorite quotes from the book: “Worksheets aren’t good enough. The students who can do them don’t need them, and the ones who struggle with them feel defeated by the red marks, which only reinforce their feelings of inadequacy. WORKSHEETS FOSTER MEDIOCRITY!” (We personally wanted to shout out when we read that!) Please include your thoughts in your Section Two Reaction.

In this chapter, Regie also sheds some light on several topics that teachers often ask about. “What about handwriting expectations?” and “Conventions, Editing and Publishing?” It’s always helpful to get another professional’s point of view on these pressing issues! Enjoy the chapter!

Chapter 5: Do More Shared Writing• Where does Shared Writing fit within the Optimal Learning Model?
• For which learners is Shared Writing appropriate?
• How can we link Shared Writing with Shared Reading?
• How can Shared Writing be used to support word work?
• What are some “Tried and True” ideas for Shared Writing?

Regie's idea of Shared Writing is very different than that of many other professionals in the field. So often we use Shared Writing only with the primary grades. As Regie states, “What a great way to teach and engage all students in all aspects of oral and written language.” If we are to consider teaching through all phases of the Optimal Learning Model, we can begin to see how important Shared Writing is for our students. We think that the idea of using Shared Writing in both upper elementary and the middle schools is a new way of thinking for many of us.

One of the reasons Regie encourages teachers to use chart paper and an easel, instead of projecting to a screen with an overhead or document camera, is that the children are seated right with you on the floor, which usually holds the children’s attention a little better. Another idea that has worked great for me is to move the overhead machine to the group area and place it on the floor in the middle of the group in front of the easel. I then project the machine onto the white space of the easel. It’s great because you’re able to be right there in the middle of the group and have the benefit of writing more quickly onto a transparency rather that chart paper. You’ll need to consider which of your Shared Writing activities you’ll want students to be rereading (don’t forget that you can hole punch transparencies and put them in a binder for future reference) and which you may want posted to your walls on charts.

Regie’s list of “Tried and True Ideas for Shared Writing” (page 112) is very extensive. It would be helpful to take a look at Regie’s list as you create your curriculum map for the year. Where would some of her suggestions fit within your science, social studies, math, reading and writing units across the year?

Chapter 6: Capitalize on the Reading-Writing Connection
• How can we become more effective integrating our reading and writing instruction?
• Are we as efficient as possible with our responses to reading?
• The benefit and necessity to integrate our content area teaching with both reading and writing
• The importance of writing (and reading) more nonfiction

We know research shows that reading achievement affects writing achievement and vice-versa, and we also know that it continually gets harder to fit “it all” into our day. Effectively using reading and writing connections throughout the day in all areas of language arts, math, science, social studies, and even specials such as art, music and library, is our only option.

Regie’s suggestion of taking a closer look at how we use written response to reading is a very important one. Careful consideration is needed to decide if what we’re asking the students to do is “worth their time.” For example, if the response we’re looking for will “deepen comprehension, cause the writer to reflect on the content, and/or foster appreciation for the text” then it’s worth it. We whole-heartedly agree with her statement that many of the overly structured assignments such as book reports can alienate our readers! While response journals do have their benefits for us professionally Regie states, “they also take up a lot of our time!” It’s a very organized teacher who can effectively keep up with their responses without feeling overwhelmed and frustrated. Don’t forget the bottom line – “Be sure that students spend more time reading than writing about reading!” (Page 126)

We are so glad that Regie addressed how to effectively teach summary writing. We know that many teachers have a difficult time differentiating between a summary and retelling – I (Jackie) was one of them until several years ago. The snapshots and procedures that Regie shares on how to teach summarizing are invaluable and should be a reference that we all refer back to throughout our teaching year.

16 comments:

  1. Essentials of Writing Assignment 4
    Irene Osterman Sussman


    While reading chapter 4 I couldn’t help but reflect on my own writing expectations. It’s very challenging, given the expectations of the Common Core, to separate “standard” expectations from those of my own. I am so fortunate to be part of a very committed grade level PLC. Throughout the year I could see that their expectations were more rigorous than mine. I am excited to use Regie’s ideas and those of my team to “up my game” next year.
    My response to the quote about worksheets, “it depends.” Our District’s curriculum worksheets for first grade do foster mediocrity because they don’t require thinking, just copying. This was also my experience at all grade levels with reading interventions. I have been told the second grade comprehension questions are good. Since I haven’t looked at those I can’t honestly say all worksheets are a waste of time, just the ones I’ve seen.
    I was struck by Regie’s emphasis on editing, handwriting, conventions etc. in this chapter as the first three chapters focused so much on content and how over editing can get in the way of writing content. Several times in the margin I wrote, “When do you do this?” Of course I didn’t get an answer . But I am curious about your strategies. I find that when first graders are done, they’re done! So if either of you have taught younger grades, how do you infuse the editing, the “perfect spelling and handwriting” that Regie says all children are capable of. I don’t disagree; I just know there’s only so much time in the day.
    I agree with Regie that shared writing is an excellent way to model while validating all students’ input and ideas. In my own class I find that if I turn my back, however briefly, the children begin to lose interest. I can see the advantages of chart paper and an easel as a way to solve that issue. However, when our principal does “walk throughs” we are judged by our use of available technology. It’s an interesting dynamic, to be on board with the latest technology and yet hang onto methods that can be more effective.
    Regie’s list for shared writing is quite extensive and a great resource for future planning. I did manage to incorporate shared writing into learning routines, discussing reading strategies, and science and social studies. However, I love her ideas of taking shared writing a step further by having students cut up sentences, rearrange them, sort words and then take them home to read and share. What a great way to extend the shared writing piece. I am also inspired to complete more class books. This for some reason was relatively easy to do in kindergarten but I found our time more limited in first grade. However, I know the children loved reading them which of course is such a great motivator for both their reading and writing.
    The most valuable insight I got from Chapter 6 was the importance of having students write about their reading! Reading time is fairly structured in our school with the emphasis on small group and independent reading following the philosophy that the more they read the better readers they will be. However, I completely see the advantage of having small notebooks for students to write answers to comprehension questions, especially if I design the questions and they answer without looking at their neighbors.
    Regie’s ideas for shared retelling and summaries are also so valuable. Again, this is something I did not do in my classroom. However, it makes sense because I do find that when I model a reading strategy, students are excited to tell me when they’ve used it. I can see the potential in modeling or sharing a retell writing piece; some students may be inspired to write their own retells. At the very least, the process should increase their comprehension and writing skills.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think any time worksheets are "interactive" and not just copy, they become better (and more of a graphic organizer). However, I agree, if it is just a copy worksheet, it is meaningless.

      I also had a hard time with the perfection she required! I had a very difficult time getting firsties to go back and re-read, or change anything (the ones that need to never want to and vice versa).

      We have the same issues with technology. Sadly, they emphasize the use of it, but fail to train us OR be sure we have adequate amounts of technology! (I have one iPad in my room, but am expected to use iPads daily...huh?) I also agree that some methods (especially for writing), can't involve technology all the time. We need to teach kids to physically write, right?

      One year, we read a book as a school. We all had a beanie baby stuffed animal that represented our class pet from the book (it was Humphrey one year from the hampster series). I had the kids each take him home one night and journal about what his night was like (from his point of view). I turned that into a shared book and it is STILL read every year - I actually need to re-bind it because it has been so loved :) I also put their sticker picture on the page so future kids can see the face of the student who wrote the book...super fun!

      Delete
    2. I have seen some worksheets that ask the students to think critically and go deeper. But the majority and over-reliance on them seem to mesh with Regie’s sentiments. ☺

      I think ALL students have a hard time learning to revise their work. When I worked in a high school, one of my duties was the Writer's Workshop and I was shocked how similar high school students were to elementary students regarding revising their writing. They just wanted it to be DONE! Really reiterating purpose and audience should help with this.

      I agree, I used an easel for my lessons and I'm sure my principal was annoyed I didn't type it on the screen like the younger teachers. I did it purposely this way, I could use the projector if I wanted to, but I chose not to. (I've changed school districts this year.) I wanted these primary students to see writing. I feel that for the rest of their lives for pleasure, work, school, communication they are going to be staring at screens. As they are developing, I think it's OK not to have EVERYTHING be on the Smartboard or projected. Technology is a tool we use to enhance our instruction, it shouldn't be the focus or purpose of the lesson. (I'll step off my soapbox now. :D)

      I also sent journals home with kids when I was in the classroom. I had an elephant, Ellie from New Delhi and Bongo, a monkey, from the Congo. I had maps and information about the real animals in those areas for the kids to read and learn about with their families and asked them to journal what they did in the evening. It was a well-loved activity. I like that you turned the journal into a class book. I didn't take it that far, but a smart idea to do. Kids do love reading the class books. :)

      Delete
    3. I couldn't agree more with the entire 3rd paragraph! Although I love technology, it doesn't always need to be used...and I don't like HAVING to use it. I like to decide on my own when it is necessary! In my humble opinion, kids should be writing - a lot! ;)

      Delete
    4. I agree and thank you for your soapbox comments! There's so much pressure today to increase "technology in the classroom" and yet there are so many ways for children to learn.

      Delete
  2. I am trained in GLAD (Guided Language Acquisition Design), and I LOVE one of their beliefs-Teach to the HIGHEST student in your class and differentiate for the rest. It is a backwards way of thinking, but it has really changed how I teach. I do keep in mind the standard, so if a student is learning WELL above the grade level, I differentiate for that student :)
    One thing mentioned in the book is, “…we need to be sticklers with any work that goes public…” I am wondering why at such young grades we require perfection? Just a thought – I find some of their mistakes ADORABLE (I have work from when I was younger, and it is so telling of what I was working on). Often I will make note of the mistake they have made, even if published, and follow up within the next writing conference, so I don’t just let the mistakes go. I DO let parents know that their kids are a work in progress and that sometimes their work will not be perfect, but that they WILL see progress. Also, some kids are just not there yet. For me to require perfection would mean I accept FAR less writing…I think :) I see the argument for expecting the writing to be perfect, too…in fact really thought the example where she told the kids she couldn’t publish their poetry because of errors, and they fixed them all was an excellent idea…thoughts? I’m wrestling with this idea…
    I like the explicit way they taught write more/tell more (Gail Westbrook was the literacy coach in my old district – she’s AMAZING)!!!
    I’m wondering what the method for correcting spelling/conventions we have deemed “no excuse” – do we make students find them? Or underline them and make students fix them? What is the best way to have them correct the mistakes?
    Sloppy handwriting…It makes me crazy. I have found that some kids develop REALLY bad habits in K/1 which are nearly impossible to break. For example, some of my kids lift their pencils SEVERAL times to write one letter, and no matter how many times I ask them to fix it, they default back to that learned way…any ideas for that? (I did see in the book to do letter formation on sand trays, white boards, and in the air).
    I underlined the part where they discussed coming up with common school-wide expectations. I think it raises expectations quickly because a lot of teachers are discussing what works for them, and we can easily see what kids are doing in other classrooms and above/below our grade level, which is powerful!
    Shared writing fits into optimal learning model right before the release of responsibility. Shared writing is good for all kids, but especially important for students with learning disabilities and English language learners. They have exposure to sentence structure and the “formula” of writing that is needed; for
    In the past few years, I’ve started having a “literacy” block. One thing I am going to increase is reading TO my students. I thought once per day (maybe twice if we were integrating in science/social studies) was enough. I’d like to start the day and end the day with something, then add throughout the day! I also like the advice of how to intentionally teach students to reread their writing. Responses need to deepen comprehension. I tend to ask kids something about the message of the chapter and apply that to their lives and the characters in the text. Or ask them to choose a favorite of something (could even be an animal in a non-fiction piece), and explain why they like best what they chose. Lastly, summary writing…duhn-duhn-duhn….I am terrible at teaching this. It is so overwhelming!!! In the book, it said k-3 doesn’t usually do summaries…however, at my school they are asking us to. I did go look in my standards and didn’t find it… I’ll search around a bit more when school starts. Regardless, I tend to agree with her. I have to use graphic organizers as a scaffold, as well as lots of shared examples. At the end of the year, many of my kids still don’t get it. I think the main thing is just keep repeating “What is the most important, main thing the author is saying (or inferring, in some cases).”

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think this goes back to what you are both asking. My thoughts are that students need to always consider their purpose and audience. If a piece is to be published it must be correct and free of errors. Though, I've also hung in the halls work that contain errors or mistakes. I put up a little sign so the "audience" whoever it is that is reading it on the wall knows that these are drafts or first attempts. I think it's about sending a consistent message through the grades that published work (in whatever form publishing may mean…hanging in the hall, for back to school night, etc…) needs to respect our audience by being as correct as possible. I don't think all writing needs to be perfect or finished to the point of publishing. That would be overwhelming. Students need a lot of practice writing and keeping portfolios to note growth is a great idea. Are you thinking that every piece needed to be perfect? That's not what Regie or we mean. But there are def. non-negotiables that need to be correct. Like starting with a capital, punctuation at the end of a sentence, using legible hand-writing. Let me know if this isn't making sense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the big part is to be sure there is an audience. I still have trouble motivating some kids to go back and revise/edit. I'm thinking of one student in my class last year (he is gifted and very much has a stereotypical gifted personality). He WOULD NOT edit past a certain point. In fact, sometimes he would make it worse. I felt like it never "stuck"...any ideas for those kiddos? I'd say most of my kids tend to be ok...

      Delete
  4. Well, there are different ways to address the non-negotiables. Word Walls or personal dictionaries. Charts hanging in the room. I'd remind the students they need to check the spelling or punctuations and they can use their dictionary or word wall. If you need to give them gentle reminders, that works also. "What comes at the start of a sentence? What's missing at the end of your sentence so the reader knows the thought is complete or done?" I don't think there is a right way to do this.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have always been big on re-teaching handwriting. For the older students who wanted to learn cursive I told them they needed to show me they knew how to print correctly. So I would do a 15 min handwriting lesson each day.

    Another idea is to discuss this at a staff meeting and make sure the lower grades are teaching handwriting correctly and checking that the kids are forming their letters correctly. I'm actually big on correct pencil grip as it is difficult to re-learn. (I've been known to tell cashier or front desk workers they are using an incorrect pencil grip.) :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is SO important - both handwriting AND grip! Someone has to teach people ;) Kids OR adults!

      Delete
  6. I don't know if you have heard of Lester Laminack. I saw him at an IRA conference 8 years ago. He's an author and literacy advocate. He says, if he was in charge of the world he'd have teachers read to students 6 times a day.

    See this link: (I think you'll have to paste it into your browser.)

    https://www.heinemann.com/shared/onlineresources/E00822/chapter2.pdf

    Here's Lester's website. You might want to check him out.

    http://www.lesterlaminack.com/learning_under_the_influence_of_language_and_literature_45825.htm

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow! 6 times per day!! Although, if I think about it, bet it is at least half of that if I take into consideration the informational texts we study, directions we read together in math, stories, science text, etc...but I love this - thank you! I'll check it out :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Chapter 4:
    The area of expectations is one that I have had a lot of questions about. Generally, I try to push my students to do more than other people think they can and they and their parents are usually very proud afterwards about their accomplishments. However, I sometimes don’t know the right time to push my expectations in writing and I like what Regie had to say. First, I definitely agree that worksheets are not the best way to teach writing. It is something that I have done in the past and students always groan and either rush through them and don’t do their best work or take too much time to do them. This chapter reaffirmed my belief that writing in any form it may be, is always better. The part that really stuck out to me is to have high expectations throughout the writing process. Once students have been writing for awhile, it should be expected that they spell familiar words correctly and have neat and legible handwriting. There have been so many times that I didn’t want to stop students from writing to have them fix these mistakes when I should have just been expecting it from the beginning. Yes, I want students to write and to not have to worry about every little thing, but they should also be able to spell familiar words and use familiar punctuation properly. If they aren’t doing these things it may be a sign that something needs to be taught during demonstration or shared writing time. Another part that stuck out to me is that students should be able to write more. Often on their IEPs we have very clear goals (e.g. student will write a topic sentence and three details about a given topic) that students need to meet. However, that doesn’t mean we need to stop there. I should be encouraging students to write more and have time to have their stories continue over more than one day of writing.

    Chapter 5:
    I really enjoyed this chapter because I think shared writing is something that my students will really be engaged with and allow them to start liking writing again. I think that it’s a great idea to be able to brainstorm and think together as a group and work collaboratively to create a piece of text for the class or for someone else. Beyond that I am seeing that it is also a great time for a lot of teaching to occur in a really meaningful context for the students. While I have done some shared writing in the past I haven’t used this writing again for students to continue learning from. I liked all of the ideas about how to use this for shared/guided reading and to use this writing for different word work skills. This is helpful when thinking that I don’t have to create extra worksheets or centers to focus on these skills, but instead use the writing that the students have already done so that it makes sense for them and builds upon what they already know. There were also SO many ideas about how to use shared writing that I know I will find useful this year. I especially liked the ideas about making how-to books and writing about special events. My students have a difficult time sequencing events and remembering details about what they did during the day and I know if we practiced writing a piece like that together that parents would love it because it would allow them to converse with their students about important events.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Chapter 6:
    I think that this chapter is really important as we are moving away from reading/writing time and moving more into language arts time, which is really the combination of the two. I’ve always thought that it was kind of silly to keep the two separate, since you can’t read without someone writing, and you can’t write unless someone is going to read it. I’ve never been a fan of book reports since I was turned off them when I was in school and so I haven’t required them of my students. However, I do like the other ideas that Regie suggests such as doing a book review or a literature response. I also was interested in the fact that she was encouraging teachers to have students do writing at all times in all subject areas. I sometimes let my students skip the writing part in areas such as science or social studies because it can take much longer and I’m not sure that they can always do it. However, I think that this goes with the previous chapter of keeping high expectations, and expecting that they can do this work with the right supports, and taking the time to do it, even if it means another day added onto the lesson. I think that by integrating all of this it will really help for planning also and making that planning time more efficient and, in the long run, shorter. If you are already working on doing shared reading with a story then it would make sense to use that story to gather a theme from to do some writing on that topic. Or if you are reading some nonfiction then to use it to write a summary or informational writing. It’s exciting to know that I will be able to really make my teaching time more meaningful for my students and not have to plan these extra activities or use meaningless worksheets.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Great point regarding IEPs! We don't have to stop there when the goal is me, let's assume the students can do even more and let them. :D

    ReplyDelete